6 articles
The 5% hurdle-rate regime sorts capital by asset duration, financing structure, and pricing power. Conviction-weighted portfolio restructuring captures structural rents — nuclear uprate rent, energy delivery premium, defense industrial base — while hedging the mechanical repricing risk of concentrated technology valuations. Calibrated probabilities for a 10–15% correction, a systemic bear market, and multiple persistence are illustrated.
Increasing output from licensed, grid-connected reactors offers faster and cheaper firm nuclear capacity than greenfield construction. Scarcity rent accrues primarily to fleet owners with remaining uprate headroom.
The 2026 Hormuz crisis demonstrated that LNG value depends on physical deliverability, not merely liquefaction cost. Open-ocean terminals are capturing the resulting route-security premium.
The 474 GW interconnection queue is not a power shortage. It is a timeline mismatch: data centers build in 1-3 years, transmission lines take 5-15 years. The bottleneck is permitting, not physics.
The energy security transition is not a discretionary narrative; it is a structural regime shift. Mapping localized physical bottlenecks — liquefaction capacity, nuclear regulatory compression, rare earth processing deficits — to conviction-weighted portfolio factor loadings.
Nuclear baseload economics is a financing problem wearing an engineering costume. The Vogtle FOAK penalty, the SMR cost curve, and what hyperscaler nuclear deals actually buy.